Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Ligitan and Sipadan dispute

The court strongly rejected the Philippines’ attempt of intervention and in doing so cited that the request made by the Philippines did not relate to the subject matter of the case. The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia xipadan now belong to Malaysia.

This is confirmed in the Report of International Court of Justice August 1 to July 31,the decision of the International Court of Justice conducted through bargaining or bargaining led by the presiding judge Gilbert Guillaume of France who determined Malaysia has sovereignty over Sipadan and Ligitan islands.

International Court of Justice cases Territorial disputes of Indonesia Territorial disputes ljgitan Malaysia Islands of Sabah in case law in Indonesia in Malaysia Indonesia—Malaysia border Indonesia—Malaysia relations in international relations.

Ligitan and Sipadan dispute – Wikipedia

This page was last edited on 11 Septemberat The Philippines query was totally dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen votes to one.

But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a nation the court using this as the main reason decided to award the islands to Malaysia based on their “effective occupation”.

Archived from the original PDF on 13 September Text Halaman Judul 0HK Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in the Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah. What it is and how it Works.

The Philippines had applied during the proceedings to intervene over the case on the basis of their claim to northern Borneo. Author Lubis, Aan Fourdes. In the early days of bilateral relations, both countries experienced an era of confrontation in The dispute began in and was largely resolved by the International Court of Justice ICJ inwhich opined that both of the islands belonged to Malaysia.

Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Justice finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia. Archived from the original on 5 March Metadata Show full item record. Retrieved 7 February Thesis S1 Uncontrolled Keywords: The approach method use for this research is Juridical Normative.

Moreover, for data analysis the writer use descriptive qualitative. Sources of data used in this study are secondary data, obtained through books, internet sites, journals, and others related to this research. Divided among multiple claimants. The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data. EngvarB from February Use dmy dates from February Thus Malaysia is entitled to draw the base line as the boundary of its territory to the outermost point of Pulau Sipadan and Pulau Ligitan.

Views Read Edit View history. In order to solve the problems above, the writer conducted Library Study for the data collecting. ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”. The problem of this research is how the effect of International Court of Justice decision in case of Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning regional boundary of the State.

Archived from the original on 7 February But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to sipaadan restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in Retrieved from ” https: This research is a type of qualitative research using descriptive method.

The consideration of the judges of ligitzn International Court of Justice in winning Malaysia is based on several factors: Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia.

Sovereignty over the islands has been disputed by Indonesia and Malaysia since and intensified in when Indonesia discovered that Malaysia had built some tourist facilities on Sipadan island.

Archived from the original on 9 April Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah. Text Bab I 1HK Based on the research, the writer concluded that the effect of International Court of Justice decision in Sipadan and Ligitan case between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning Regional boundary of the State is no longer appropriate.

Abstract Indonesia’s diplomatic relations with friendly countries especially ligitn Malaysia was formally established since 31 August when Malaysia declared its independence.

Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.