K. GALINSKY: Augustan Culture. an Interpretive Introduction. + , 6 pls, ills . Princeton: Princeton University Press, Cased, $/? Buy Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction New Ed by Karl Galinsky ( ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free . With Augustan Culture, Karl Galinsky has offered the most important single volume about the Augustan period since Zanker’s Power of Images. Galinsky’s.
|Published (Last):||22 May 2010|
|PDF File Size:||17.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Regarding poetry, Galinsky does not tell us many things new, but he nicely brings together into a few pages current opinio communis. Zanker, Power of Images Refresh and try again. Galinsky again, however, seems to get bogged down a bit by the propaganda problem. This brotherhood of cultivation was reorganized by Augustus, who significantly elevated its status. Auguztan book is not yet featured on Listopia.
Books by Karl Galinsky. Hardie, gqlinsky, they certainly provided a fitting mythological prototype for that shield and for the Virgilian shield of Aeneas cf.
In the case of Virgil, he continues his discussion of Aeneas’ choices and his comparison with heroes of Greek epic I love, love Karl Galinsky former professor of mine at UT and his books regarding culture during the age of Augustus rock!
He demonstrates that Augustus himself seems to have made the association, as the inclusion of caryatids in the Temple of Mars Ultor also suggests, harking back to uclture Erechtheum cf. North American Classicists are particularly indebted to him for mediating a wide range of German scholarship and for enriching our understanding of public art and the traditions behind it.
Jim Westcot rated it culturr was amazing Nov 29, The disrepair of religion itself reflected the disorder of the Roman state in the decades just before Augustus’ rule. After this, Augustus chose to emphasize “the transforming aspect of his leadership” especially evident in his production of the Secular Games of 17 and his receiving of the title of pater patriae fifteen years later.
All of this leads rather nicely into a discussion of Augustan poetry. But while many readers will become immediately engaged with Galinsky’s reading of the Princeps aigustan his ideology, this reviewer must postpone the temptation to discuss the emperor and his historian until she has clearly indicated the structure and strengths of this splendid synoptic study. The lavish building program begun by Caesar and augmented and completed by Augustus also reflected his auctoritas.
Citing a number of ancient sources that establish a connection between moral reinvigoration and imperialistic ambition, Galinsky justifies Augustus in his donning of the mantle of world dominator This freedom, Galinsky seems to believe, is something that increased rather than waned throughout the Augustan age cuoture a very different opinion, one might see, of course, Gordon Williams’ Change and Decline, et passim.
He also discusses Horace’s universalism of certain values: Self-glorification on the part of private individuals was therefore tolerated under Augustus. For the most part it could be shaped and was shaped as much by individuals besides Augustus as it was by him” This bound Apollo to the remote ancestors of the Latins cf.
Galinsky’s final assessment of Livy’s history, namely that it “has little in common with the sophistication we find in the best Augustan poetry” does not give Livy his due. He wanted to rule not on illegitimate grounds, but rather with a broad base of participation.
In light of the contrast between Augustus’ public benevolence and his harsher actions, it is fitting that Galinsky concludes this chapter by remarking that “the Aeneid is a true reflection of the Augustan age because it is so far from one dimensional” Each was aere perennius.
The poetic environment that Propertius creates, if more like the day-to-day world of the urbs, is nevertheless quicker to take up the mythological exempla of epic. Herbert rated it it was amazing Mar 12, Perhaps as important is his acquisition of permanent tribunal sacrosanctitas in 36, which, if it does not necessarily elevate its bearer to semi-devine status de facto, at least puts him in a position essentially beyond the law, and in that sense makes him godlike.
His argument funnels to Aeneas’ particular decision about whether or not to spare Turnus. The aristocracy’s failure to participate in the building program was in part due to the fact that the monetary base of the senatorial class was gallinsky eroding, which perhaps also accounts for the general failure of senators to engage in the affairs of state.
First, and most obvious, cultue the deification of Julius Caesar, whereby Octavian himself became divi filius. Numa was one of Augustus’ primary models of inspiration because Numa was associated with Apollo and because he was the quintessential paradigm of reverence for religion.